advantages and disadvantages of using a table and css formatting

That you had a problems on a site you were developing doesnt mean my tutorials arent accurate. IE and Opera supports CSS as different logic. Tables should only be used to display tabular data but what is tabular data is debatable. HTML tables impose a more rigid structure on the content than a div. If there is a specific tutorial that isnt working for you just let me know which one and Ill be happy to take a look to see if there are any errors. No matter how many times I see this question or people making an argument on behalf of their opinion, the technical answer remains the same. It takes some practice, but its really much easier than you might think. Thanks Craig. On the other hand, judicious use of semantically meaningful HTML combined with CSS might confine such changes to the CSS and the pictures used. Menu. I think making your structural elements independent is the better option. Feel free to contact me if you want me to develop the home page without tables. Youre mainly proving my point that those who argue in favor of tables usually havent spent the time to learn to use block level elements like divs and css well. Having developed and worked on sites both ways Im 100% certain structuring your layout with tables is not the way to go. Ive never read about this debate until now, however in the back of my mind I always knew someone(s) was debating it. Also, Ive found no help in trying to figure out how to replicate the effect of a table layout where certain cells are merged. My old webpage is ugly (www.dragora.com) so I started to develop a new page (www.dragora.com/newindex1.asp). Sorry I didnt reply sooner John. I cant and wont tell you that you have to abandon tables. For instance, if you want colmns with different colour backgrounds to be the same length, use a simple table and style it with css. I have used some CSS to style the text, but not the design. Not all browsers (especially older versions) render tables the same. Youll have more control over how your page displays with divs that can aid in how a screenreader sees your content, but again you can create equally accessible pages using either approach. Other people would find it just as easy to code the same layout with css. Also I said speed isnt the main reason for choosing a css layout over a table-based layout. This would be more about inline css or using html attributes like the font tag vs a separate stylesheet. Why does it matter how divs are rendered as long as the document written with strong conventions and good semantics? Tuples support multi typed-values, indexes, optimized for lookup, but a lack of schema flexibility. Thanks for this. Even though I think css is the better way, Ive seen some very poor and slow loading css driven sites and some pretty well coded and quick table driven sites. A list? Your text should reflow with changes. That extra pass at the code makes table-based layouts take longer to display. I typed along with all the code samples and it helped me a lot. Itll be interesting to see how it develops and also what kind of browser support it gets. I hear you Bill. BTW why css layout over table layout? How to Play and Pause CSS Animations using CSS Custom Properties ? I wrote a 2 part tutorial on turning design image into a css layout for another site. I REALLY dont have any desire to fight that battle again. Its easier because youre more familiar with using tables. Unless you offer specifics Im going to assume youre just name calling, because you were unhappy with my previous comment. No one is going to stop you. You do have to put in a little time to learn how to layout a site with css, but once learned its not hard to do. You can definitely hire someone to create a template for the site if you want. I really resented (and it sounds like many of you do too) all the time I had to spend to get a site to look as it was intended for ALL users. With a div-based layout you could make this change in your stylesheet alone. This is the same when using divs. I watched many people struggle when it comes to nesting tables. Nothing you said is true and most of it doesnt make any sense. Once a again, thank you for the info! With a table-based layout the only way this would be possible would be to go into every page of your site and change the underlying structure. divs vs tables RIGHT! search engines are more friendly. Did you read the post? Disadvantages of OS Maps (3) Scale needed, instantly out of date, doesn't have seasonal changes. After making the changes we need to confirm the compatibility if they appear. The first thing we need to do is sort out the spacing/layout default table styling is so cramped! Its pretty common to do when first learning css. Covering popular subjects like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Python, SQL, Java, and many, many more. Tables and divs are the structure. There are many databases with different data formats to choose for an application. Instead you chose to insult me and the tutorials here. You can still develop an accessible site with tables. Not doing something because it takes time to learn is laziness. WebDisadvantages of tables. I think your experience is similar to what most people whove made the transition from tables to css go through. Its quicker to develop with tables Nope. By a few I mean less than 5. It certainly lags behind other browsers, but for the most part IE fro version 7 on is css2 compliant. I feel like one of the reasons that tables are still so widely used are the WYSIWYGs. This post isnt a tutorial so I would need to know which one or ones youre referring to as well. WebDisadvantages of Sketch Maps (3) easily exaggerated and distorted, one view at one point in time, not an accurate representation of an area. Incidentially you do provide 100% of the code because you show it in your examples, in the source. Any styles defined in the internal and external style sheets are overridden by inline styles. I believe Whats best in a given scenario depends mostly on the skill set of the person doing the job. It wasnt my intention. Thats actually where the hype is. (i know theres gotta be one but thats almost another argument for CSS over tables multiple ways you can go about it even). But now not only is the solution more convoluted with containers i.e the complexity in code grows proportionally with the amount of columns compared to a simple table but we still dont really have equal length columns as its only the containers that are equal length and not the content/sidebar divs themselves. The limiting factors isnt the language, its my ability to use the language. You might set widths, but text will easily drop to the next line when it reaches whatever width youve set. I will need to learn more about how to use cssdiv to do a page layout. To design in CSS is far better, by the subject of order, maintenance, accessibility, navigability and thousand reasons more. So, if thats the structure it uses the same amount of code. More code leads to more potential for errors. Some times you just need to get it done and move on. If I tired to reply to your comment in Spanish it would take me hours, even days, to put together a few coherent sentences. I coded up 3 different versions of the same page (divs, tables, tables with table-layout:fixed), and then ran some benchmarks on performance and file sizes. The post right after shows a 3 column layout. You can respectfully disagree, but Im still going to say youre wrong. I also believe the opposite, theres no point using table rendering if you DO want them to be independent. This is what Dreamweaver template files do. Tables are like having the blocks bolted together and needing all blocks to be bolted before the structure itself holds together. CSS is not hard to learn.The argument is made by people comparing learning something new to learning something they already know well. Now, select the Table tab > click the Options button > uncheck the Automatically Resize to Fit Contents check box. You have to look at the bigger picture instead of focusing in on one aspect of that picture. It could mean one less page they get to crawl on your site. Learning at write CSS layouts can be tricky, especially if you become familiar with usage tables, but here's why CSS is your best programming bet. Let me apologize in advance because what Im about to say may come across as harsh. A div-based layout is: easier to maintain less code and less Its the kind of thing that might move you from #8 to #7, but not from page 5 to the first page. A square peg and a round hole can both be perfect examples of each and yet not work well together. There are a few downsides while using CSS. You say that people apparently think tables are easier than css because they already know tables, but I think youre wrong there. The form on the bottom left of the homepage is an html feedback form through http://www.freedback.com. The third problem with tables is in how browsers render them. Neither is true. Sometimes they write for things called tabloids, or articles of paragraphs arranged in tabular form. If I ever learn CSS completely, Ill use it more often as you cant fight progress but Ill never discount tables from the equation. of CSS vs tables when it is clear that one can can use CSS techniques with respect to tables as well as divs? To me, framing the debate this way is yet another attempt to make a distinction Theres a huge error in logic in your argument. As for the I dont need any extra code to get stuff to work for ie when using divs and css, really is that so? If you were to point one out to me Id either fix it or explain why it might not be working for you and probably even help you make it work. Its huge. (Dont laugh, my skills probably saved my job.) Long Run Maintenance 5. w3c standards are useless 6. structure and content css vs tables round II. The separation of content and style makes it easier to adjust pages and styles. If you click through on some of the links in the post or just do a search for css vs tables youll come across a lot of the reasoning why some prefer tables. I agree that CSS is much better in theory, but as long as people use IE and Microsoft refuses to be standards compliant, I dont think CSS for structure is the greatest idea. The only time I ever use tables anymore is to quickly horizontally and -vertically- oppose an image or something else on a temporary coming soon type page. Yes you use less code using divs than tables. Global changes are easier: If youre using external styles, you make a change in one place and its automatically propagated to all the pages in the system. A-143, 9th Floor, Sovereign Corporate Tower, We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. The advantages with using divs are essentially counter to the problems with tables described above. One thing Ive noticed in your tutorials is that your not very accurate with alignment. very nice article, good job, i wanted to add my comment based on my own humble experience.. CSS is like a a sword, once you master it, you could be a powerful warrior, and if you truly go advanced with it, youll never ever consider tables once you start writing complicated web apps, that consist of heavy javascript code for the layout, youll feel how important CSS is.. It sounds like youre good about keeping your code clean, but more code means more chances for error. Your tutorials are really only half-done and stop at the parts where css begins breaks down. There are SOME layouts that to use entirely CSS requires an inordinate amount of extremely messy code to represent. Out of curiosity can you offer an advantage of table-based layout over divs and css? Anyway, the real reason I wanted to comment here is because I think it is hilarious that Ive been reading people bashing table layouts and saying they cant stand any website that uses tables, then I view the source code and they are commenting on a page that uses tables! Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a table and CSS formatting for displaying the fitness centers hours and fees on the website. However, laying out an entire web page in css is what I want to learn (using divs) and I cant seem to find an online tutorial specifically for that. I agree with using divs and css to display content for what I think is a pretty simple reason if I want to change the look of my site I can write a new style sheet using the same div IDs and the site is suddenly completely different. I come from a developer background and am now working as an SEO consultant (I know, Boooo and all that) so I am definately an advocate of divs and I have to disagree with: Search engines dont care one bit if the code behind your page uses tables or divs. The similar change affects on all the browsers. Id rather use the more forward thinking approach, but again to each their own. Artificial intelligence design advantages: How can AI help to design? In addition there are the little seemingly obscure css properties that need to be inserted to make certain things function properly in general, or with older browsers. However. Versatility: It refers to lots of skills. I dont offer any advantage per se, on tables over divs. Now I barely have to test my layouts in multiple browsers because Ive learned how to keep them consistent across browsers. By So if you feel strong emotions regarding CSS layout, dont respond. My guess as to why they didnt learn it as well as you is because its actually not intuitive as you say, especially when trying to implement a grid shape with 3 independent blocks. Thats not the case. Web Explain the advantages and disadvantage of using stylesheets; Use CSS to create web pages. I never said I prefur tables. Any one which have basic knowledge of programming can easily lean JavaScript. This process allows me to offer fixed price websites without a lot of risk that Im going to have to eat a lot of hours resolving cross browser compatibility issues. Theres really no reason in my opinion to use floats on a horizontal list when the goal is to have the list elements cooperate rather than be independent blocks whose widths are determined by content and padding. Yet every few months someone else pops in here to tell me why Im clueless and to argue in favor of table-based layout. Tables will get you on the air with display compatibility quickly and with confidence. The person usually chose a complicated path to solving the problem when a much simpler path existed. Tables will self adjust to keep the lines aligned. The fact that order matters even with divs invalidates a lot of the arguments table haters constantly throw out, but considering were trying to layout documents in the first place, it makes sense that order matters, otherwise the whole semantics argument would be totally out the window too! The key issue is not to use tables for the layout of your site template. I did say calling this css vs tables isnt really correct and that its really about tables and divs. Thats it. Nothing in this post is meant to condemn people from using tables for site layout. I do understand your point. I dont use DreamWeaver and you dont need to add fixed dimensions everywhere to make divs work. The spiders are highly efficient at discerning code from content. Now lets get to some of the myths on both sides that keep this debate going. There is no drag and drop anymore. Regarding flexibility, I can see your point about how divs/css can make it possible to flip columns around by only making changes to a css file, and have those changes propagate to many files. Which CSS framework is better Tailwind CSS or Bootstrap ? An example of this lie is what proponents of divs like to show off by only having a few divs compared to a table structure, but in order to get even close to having the same properties as table we have to use something like the last example in http://www.vanseodesign.com/css/equal-height-columns/ as the others are just faking the appearance with a background image. Your email address will not be published. WebHere are the top 5 reasons to use Word Styles: 1. Even a simple html site can utilize include files for repeating blocks of markup. As we add more to the pages design the table complexity continues to increase compared to divs. How to use CSS in different dimension (CSS-in-JS) ? Here is the CSS code, so far, through Dreamweaver: Learning to write CSS layouts bucket be tricky, especially if you are usual with using tables, but here's why CSS is your best programming bet. If your dealing with a site that was built with tables then youre probably going to continue using tables on that site. It separates style from content (editable/un-editable). Easy to learn: JavaScript is easy to learn. Ive heard the argument that reduced code helps with SEO, with people saying that too much code makes it harder for Google to parse. I agree with what you are saying, however I think with the advancement of HTML 5, tables will start to disappear. Tables can be part of your layout, but they shouldnt make up the entire layout. Thanks Emma. For If you look at the source code of most sites (especially the ones you like) youll discover that most and nearly all use css for page layout. I learned through them. The phone number and search can either be wrapped together in another div thats floated to the right or they could each be floated to the right independently. You can separate style and structure with both css and tables. If anything I think the code would be almost equal and the differences insignificant. But using tables and styling them completely with CSS is just as effective as CSS alone. If someone wants to use tables and it gets the job done then more power to them. Covering popular subjects like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Python, SQL, Java, and Taylor Graphics, LLC Your comment suggests your commenting on the title of this post and not the content of the post. There might be cross-browser issues while using CSS. Just for the entirety of your layout.

Lifted Truck For Sale, Articles A