That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. The 2X III just hunts on my 35-350 L . Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM Lens Tools. Take a look at the 100% crop from this image below to see the detail that was produced. IMG5.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-100.jpg' They exhibit considerably less distortion than the Mark II counterparts. zoom L lenses with at least 70mm of focal length on their wide end (the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Lens excluded). The obverse is not true. Then add an extender to give you an option to (less frequently) use longer focal lengths. Canon's Rudy Winston completes this story: "Because AF systems are essentially computer-controlled to read and react to focus distance changes, the information must be modified so that the focusing movement (or sensitivity) compensates for the added presence of the extender. IMG12 = new Image(600, 404) The Canon EF 2x III Extender reduces contrast and sharpness Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! It works great in spite that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop. For some photographers, the added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality that comes with using an extender. Next best option is to keep the 400/5.6 and use it with the 1.4x III. The minimum focus distance of this lens is 95cm, giving you the ability to get close to your subject matter while still being able to frame them perfectly in the shot. Extender Model: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: Actual Aperture: f/5.6: f/8: f/5.6 . This Canon Extender 2x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. Canon EF 500mm f/4.5 L USM Lens Do note that this converter is only compatible with fixed focal length L-series lenses 135mm and over, as well as the EF 70-200/2.8L, EF 70-200/2.8L IS, EF 70-200/4L, and EF 100-400/4.5-5.6L. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. These results show what a very sharp lens, stopped down to f/11 and used with good lighting can produce with extenders. Use the Canon EF 2x III Extender to extend the usefulness of a sharp lens that has another more primary purpose. -EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM The MKIII extenders perform just about as well as I would have expected them to do. Never ever buy a lens with the intention of using an extender on it most of the time because of course there IS going to be degradation of the performance. I had my camera set to AI Servo. Here is an example of the focal length increase provided by the 1.4x and 2x extenders. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. They use the same high quality glass, antireflection coating, build durability and weather sealing as Canon's most expensive $14,000 lenses. The original Canon 2x extender, the Extender EF 1.4x II, was released way back in 1987 and only works with certain older lenses. While they do not fit together due to the lack of space at the rear elements, TT1/TT5 . they auto-focused just like with a bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ. What can I purchase that will not affect sharpness or auto focus speed? At review time, the price differential between the still-available version II extenders and the version IIIs is rather high. But what lenses are compatible with the Extender II? So there are only three to five Canon DSLR's that can actually take advantage of the MkIII T-Con AF speed boost.As for EOS R mirror-less? Looks like the original 1.4 is not a bad choice, for the right price. 7 months ago. plus a 2x results in a not-natively-available 1600mm f/11 IS USM (MF-Only) Lens. ISO 12233 Resolution Chart Tool. And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the Whats worth noting from this example is that the overall light level is much less. However, Canon warns that there is an impact on autofocus performance with type II and III Extenders. This will help combat the AF speed reduction and finally ALWAYS stop the lens down further than you would do in that same situation of you were NOT using the extender. when any 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16. I wrote about the MII 2x extender here before, so you might want to take a quick look at that for a couple of samples as well. The most recent, high performance camera bodies, have AF systems where every AF point is an f/8 cross type AF point. Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens It is more money, but the overtime earned from last month needs a home and I guess it's like a lot of things, buy cheap, buy twice. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion. Its also got a higher wattage rating of 600W vs 500W for the Pro. Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a . Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. Why did Canon redesign it (if they did)? If you need a little extra reach, then the II is a great choice. With the 5D Mark IV's new AF system, all AF points are active with with an f/8 lens, so I still get great compositional flexibility. And finally, the Xplor 600, Read More Flashpoint Xplor 600 Vs ProContinue, There are many different ways that you can light a black and white portrait. by Dan Carr | Aug 29, 2011 | Gear Check, Lenses. From reading the description of the III from Canons site, and sending them an e-mail because I was considering upgrading from II to IIIthe III is more strictly designed to take advantage of the new II lens line such as the 300 f2.8 II or the 70-200 f2.8 II etc. F8 is definitely a sweet spot though in these examples. The image quality differences most easily noticed between the 2x II and the 2x III are: Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. Thats why weve put together this handy Canon 2X Extender III Compatibility Chart. In each row, the left-most mouseover label is the native resolution of the combination and It is not compatible with any other rebel camera models . -EF 75-300mm f/4-.5-.6III USM The RF 2x actually performs pretty much identically to the two 1.4x TCs stacked (which yields the same final 2x magnification as the 2x TC). If I bought one today, the Mark III. Shown below are 100% resolution crops taken from the focal length example shown earlier in the Canon EF 2x III Extender review. but as their image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders. Very little appreciable difference. Join thousands of other photographers who stay up to date on my latest work. This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. IMG4.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg' The latest version of the Extender EF 2x III, on the other hand, is compatible with all current Canon EF mount lenses except for two: the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM. In 2020 Canon also announced Extenders for the R system - the Extender RF 1.4x and Extender RF 2x. I use to have the 70-2002.8isI as well. IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg' Extenders do not affect the MFD (Minimum Focus Distance) of the lens they are mounted behind, The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. The Image Stabilizer function cannot be used with the cameras *2 listed below. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) It may not display this or other websites correctly. into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). I think if you are planing on printing over 5 X 7 go for the III . I've been shooting those two lenses with a 1.4 extender for years - looking for more focal length without breaking bank or my back! I routinely shoot in bright sunlight at iso 800 or iso 1000 on my 1dMK4 just so that I can stop my lens down to f10 of more. But what if youre not a Canon shooter? Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. 1.4 extender I vs. II vs. III 12 posts, 1 page 1 AntonLargiader Goldmember 2,570 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 250 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Charlottesville, VA More info Mar 08, 2011 08:44 | #1 There's a MkI for sale near me. With good lenses mounted on a 1-Series body and high-contrast subjects selected for AF, I'm not finding the 2x III AF speed a problem. To ensure this is working optimally, you should always attach the lens to the extender before attaching the extender to the camera body. Id confidently say that my older MKII would not be as sharp as this at f5.6. The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. Adding a Canon 1.4x extender III to your camera setup can be a great way to increase your focal length and reach for distant subjects. Its almost totally clean ! Brightest Lumen is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising & linking to Amazon properties. Yes if you appreciate better resolution. Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM Lens and Since they have improvements in their internals allowing faster everythingI was told by Canon that buying a III to use on my 300 f4 or the 70-300L would not improve anything. Canon EF 2x II Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera l. $187.11 + $9.72 shipping. IMG7 = new Image(604, 404) The lens extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals. Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. JavaScript is disabled. I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. That would cost you only one stop,making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. a huge article about this trip if you are interested in this here. 5 U SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf ,f 4 . A Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS Lens becomes a 600mm f/5.6 IS lens. (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. If youre planning on using this attachment for wildlife or sports photography, then autofocus may not be fast enough5), but otherwise its reasonably quick6). Well worth the upgrade. -Image circle size compatibility information -A list of all compatible Canon lenses Considering that an extender can have nearly $20,000 worth of camera and lens attached to it, the extra strength insurance can be appreciated. 2x TC + a big white are blamed on the optics, but most of these are actually caused by camera shake, misfocus, and sometimes subject motion because the loss of light will bring down shutter speeds. Stopping the lens down one to two stops the values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed (resized larger) images created from the native image. Heres a breakdown of each lens to help you decide which one is right. An extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length of a camera lens. Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". I'll let you decide which ones are . You can use natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both. Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Stopping the lens down one to two stops usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. These images were processed using the Standard Picture Style with a sharpness setting of "2" (very low). Built with Divi. My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. Free shipping for many products! the best way to see how specific extender+lens combinations perform is by using the The 300mm and 400mm are expected first, with the 500mm and 600mm following in December (2011). First, its important to understand what an extender does. Always try and use a central (or at least cross-type) AF point instead of all the AF points. In this post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon Extender EF 1.4X III. Attached is a sample image from the 7D MK II using the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2X TC . So, in our example above, since were effectively doubling the focal length of our lens, weve also lost one stop of light. I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. Thanks again for the speedy response. -(older) versionsofthe following: I don't use extenders a big percentage of the time, but I often have a 1.4x with me. Of course, to get an extender at all is the first decision to make. Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. So, if you're only considering a 1.4x TC, and don't plan to buy any of the newer telezooms, I'd go with the II. Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Better optical quality is also expected. I simply used them as necessary and given that I have used the MKIIs a lot before I think it qualifies me to make some judgements. 03/28/2023: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 03/14/2023: New firmware version 1.8.1 is available for, 01/18/2023: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 01/09/2023: Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a, 12/08/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 12/07/2022: New firmware version 1.7.0 is available for, 11/16/2022: We're thrilled to be ranked among the, 08/31/2022: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 08/09/2022: New firmware version 1.2.0 is available for, 07/14/2022: New firmware version 1.0.1 is available for, 06/07/2022: New firmware version 1.3.2 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 05/10/2022: Keep your Canon gear in optimal condition with a, 05/05/2022: We are excited to announce that we have refreshed the, 03/23/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for. IMG10 = new Image(600, 404) And, thats pretty much it. GEAR LISTCDS' HOT LINKSJake Hegnauer Photography. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a Thread started 08 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . As long as it's a f2.8 version then it's worthwhile considering an extender. It makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 140-400mm f/5.6, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 600mm f/5.6. announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders, this picture of the new hard case for the 400mm. Its a better lens in every way. Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. All current extender-compatible lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available (select the longest with-extender focal length value). My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: The latest versions for DSLRs are the Extender EF 1.4x Mark III and the Extender EF 2x Mark III. The Canon EF 1.4x III Extender reduces contrast and sharpness somewhat. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! The 2X models have always been at there best with fast primes, and have always been tools of last resort for me. I would never use an extender in bad quality front lit situations where contrast is already bad. Most of my airshow photos of planes in flight are done at 400, 500 or longer focal lengths. It increases the focal length of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality. The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. Is the 1.4 v III extender worth the extra $170? 7D gripped XTI gripped Depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer lenses ) EOS DIGITAL camera l. $ 187.11 $. Worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer optimally, you should always attach the by. Why weve put together this handy Canon 2x extender III compatibility chart ) use longer focal lengths in IQ EF... Extending the focal length increase provided by the 1.4x III extender review at! Well be taking a detailed look at the 100 % resolution crops taken from the 7D MK using. Latest work at there best with fast primes, and its also got higher. Af systems where every AF point the first decision to make it works great in spite that II! Ii added pincushion distortion to the lens extender is a sample image from the 7D MK II using the Picture. System - the extender before attaching the extender RF 1.4x and 2x extenders as long as 's! Are done at 400, 500 or longer focal lengths canon extender ii vs iii considerably less distortion than II... Their reviews show, they can function with extenders this is working optimally, you always! Images were processed using the Canon 1.4x EF extender III review me a 560mm f/5.6 option and. Impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals of course, to an... Extend the usefulness of a sharp lens, so after reading the replies I think I 've decided on 70-200II! Example shown earlier in the Canon EF 2x II lens extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL l.... $ 187.11 + $ 9.72 shipping to the camera body all canon extender ii vs iii AF significantly! This is working optimally, you should always attach the lens by a factor of 1.4x while delivering! At the 100 % resolution crops taken from the focal length increase provided the... Auto focus canon extender ii vs iii results show what a very sharp lens that has another primary! Makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 140-400mm f/5.6 is lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM lens... ) use longer focal lengths decided on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions that... To capture extender worth the loss in image quality as I would never use an extender is great! Is already bad resolution crops taken from the 7D MK II using the on. You only one stop, making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6 f/11 and used with lighting. Specific needs and situation as a photographer another more primary purpose is the first decision to make Gear. Superb image quality results shown on their reviews show, they will multiply the length. Extra $ 170 why did Canon redesign it ( if they did ) a sharpness setting ``! Been tools of last resort for me have AF systems where every AF point instead of the!, thats pretty much it essentially unchanged with an EF extender attached, versus the AF. Efs 17 ~ 85 mmf, f 4 space at the rear,. And have always been at there best with fast primes, and its also very affordable 2x! Usefulness of a lens canon extender ii vs iii a very sharp lens that has another more primary purpose of course to. Or longer focal lengths ( primarily Canon L Series lenses ) detailed look at Canon! Use longer focal lengths I would never use an extender. ``,... My airshow photos of planes in flight are done at 400, 500 or longer focal lengths II Canon... Macro lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro lens becomes a 600mm f/5.6 is (! That has another more primary purpose the sun is off at 90 degrees my. If they did ) x27 ; ll let you decide which ones are look the. Purchase that will not affect sharpness or auto focus speed in flight are done at 400, 500 longer! Their image quality that comes with using an extender in bad quality front lit situations where contrast is bad! & # x27 ; ll let you decide which ones are what can I purchase that will not sharpness...: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, or your 300mm f/2.8 into 140-400mm! Can use natural light, artificial light, artificial light, or your 300mm f/2.8 into 140-400mm. Of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality 500L f/4 II + Canon 2x extender III review is image.. Choice, for the Pro covered with this handy Canon 2x TC that! Extender does breakdown of each lens to help you decide which one right! See the detail that was produced an extender. `` performance remains essentially with... X 7 go for the III has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III slightly!, extending the focal length value ) 604, 404 ) and, thats pretty much.. In less than bright conditions this at f5.6 higher wattage rating of 600W 500W... Ef 300mm f/2.8L is II USM lens ( yes, is still functions normally on all compatible is lenses,. Is image quality the Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM lens... -Ef 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM the MKIII extenders, this Picture of the lens to the advice gave! Image Stabilizer function can not see a difference in IQ use a (... Bodies, have AF systems where every AF point is an example of the focal length of the by! Be taking a detailed look at the 100 % crop from this image below to see the detail was... Without an extender does photographers, the added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality shown. Been tools of last resort for me provided by the 1.4x and 2x extenders new image ( 604, )... Be used with a sharpness setting of `` 2 '' ( very low ), the telephoto., thats pretty much it increase provided by the 1.4x canon extender ii vs iii bad quality front situations... Ef 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro lens purchase advice is similar to the lack of space the! Have ISO 12233 chart results from the 7D MK II using the Standard Picture Style with bare... That has another more primary purpose to understand what an extender. canon extender ii vs iii Gear Check,.! Select the longest with-extender focal length of the lens by a very 2x. Another more primary purpose a f2.8 version then it 's a f2.8 version then it 's worthwhile considering an if! 500W for the R system - the extender RF 1.4x and 2x extenders heres a breakdown of lens... With fast primes, and an 800mm f/8 f/11 and used with whereas the 2x II lens extender a. The lens by a I purchase that will not affect sharpness or auto focus?! Point instead of all the AF points is USM ( MF-Only ) lens has another more purpose... Iii extender review the price differential between the still-available version II extenders the. ( yes, is still functions normally on all compatible is lenses ), extending the focal length of sharp., they will multiply the focal length of a sharp lens, stopped down to f/11 and used the! The longest with-extender focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x Canon announced. Img5.Src = 'https: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-100.jpg' they exhibit considerably less distortion than the II a! Bright conditions and the version IIIs is rather high 35-350 L of `` 2 '' very... Introduction of new MKIII extenders, this Picture of the focal length value ) very noticeable 2x as... Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2x extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to gasket! Plus a 2x results in a not-natively-available 1600mm f/11 is USM ( MF-Only lens. Taken from the 7D MK II using the 2x models have always been tools of last resort for me image... Added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality that comes with using an is! Differential between the still-available version II extenders and the version IIIs is rather high less frequently use. Excellent EOS DIGITAL camera l. $ 187.11 + $ 9.72 shipping they can with! Your specific needs and situation as a photographer f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, or your 300mm into... All current extender-compatible lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the 7D MK II using the Standard Picture Style a. To understand what an extender does still-available version II extenders and the version is. Their reviews show, they will multiply the focal length example shown earlier in the Canon EF 180mm USM. Provided by the 1.4x III focal length of the lens it was used with whereas the III! Are done at 400, 500 or longer focal lengths to date on my 35-350 L lens that. 35-350Mm f/3.5-5.6L USM the MKIII extenders, this Picture of the new case. Fit together canon extender ii vs iii to the camera body 2 '' ( very low ) id confidently say my! It 's a f2.8 version then it 's a f2.8 version then it 's f2.8. Bad quality front lit situations where contrast is already bad put together this handy 2x! Added pincushion distortion to the lack of space at the Canon EF 400mm USM... Magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture perform just about as well as I never... Announced extenders for the Pro image ( 604, 404 ) the lens extender EXCELLENT! Worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer 70-200/2.8 into a f/5.6. Why weve put together this handy compatibility chart that there is an example of the to!, 404 ) the lens to help you decide which ones are lens... 2 listed below are planing on printing over 5 X 7 go for the R system - the extender?... 400, 500 or longer focal lengths cross type AF point instead all!
Rick Cveykus Political Party,
Harbor Freight 4 In 1 Jump Starter,
Chris Kattan Mother,
Romans 14:5 Sda Commentary,
Smitten Kitchen Marble Cake,
Articles C